Radio — May 7, 2010 8:05 — 7 Comments
RFNI Episode 2
Share
Spare Your people, O Lord, and do not give Your heritage to reproach, that the nations should rule over them. ~ Joel 2:17
This podcast contains a discussion on Interracial Marriage. We had a few technical issues with this episode, so please excuse the poor mic quality on Ehud for the first 10 minutes.
- What is the Biblical definition of adultery?
- What about the “mixlings” or mixed race offspring? What about a mixed-race rape victim’s offspring?
- What did God command the Israelites to do with their men who were involved in a mix-race marriage?
Other thoughts for a future discussion:
- Is Miscegenation a broken 5th Commandment of honoring your father and mother?
- Is Interracial Marriage the same as Gay Marriage?
- What Biblical examples of mixed race marriages do we have?
Deuteronomy 23:3 as discussed at the end of the podcast.
“No Ammonite or Moabite may enter the assembly of the LORD. Even to the tenth generation, none of them may enter the assembly of the LORD forever… [Read Ehud's Mamzer of Deuteronomy]
Further study and links of interest to this podcast:
- CDA Walk For Stereotypes?
- Telegony on Wikipedia
- Leviticus 19:19 on the mixing of beasts from Ehud’s blog.
- Hebrews 12:7-16 on Miscegenation from Ehud’s blog
- Race and Family
- Racial Harmony and Interracial Marriage
I would like to know how girls or women who have mixed with a black man in the past would be
Most excellent! Thanks so much for exposing the hypocrisy and hubris of ‘christians’ who champion interracial marriage and adoption!
Here’s what they’re saying: ‘I can elevate my non-white spouse into white standards of society.’ or, ‘I can raise black/brown/yellow kids better then their natural parents.’
They are the real white supremacists. All I want is the right to associate with my own.
That’s true, Randall. As long as egalitarian Whites attribute non-whites’ lack of civilization to “poverty, racism, and a lack of education”, they’re inherently assuming the non-whites in question to be ignorant slaves, incapable of generating any civilization aside from the custodianship of white liberals.
And they’re always horrified to learn that non-whites resent their liberal paternalism more than our sovereignty-minded “racism”.
@Mareese, I’m not sure what you were intending to ask. It seems that you’re message was cut short. Please try again.
Another superb podcast. I’m so thankful that y’all are doing these programs. I finally have something worth listening to in my radio-and-CD-less old truck…
And the discussion of “mamzer” and mongrel, etc. was very solid. It should be required listening in seminaries.
I came across you guys completely by accident.Loved the 2 shows so far that youve done.Im just wondering when is the next one lol.Cant wait to hear it.
Even Matthew Henry’s commentary on “adultery” from the early 1700′s, and the Westminster Catechism refer to “adultery” as how “neighbors” should treat one another with chastity, and is very ambiguous as far as racial (“non-neighbor”?) differences, though historical practice was, in general, racially exclusive. What other historical church writings confirm as desirable racial purity?